Selvsagt, dette er Murdock-eide kanaler som selv i rettssaker har sagt at deler av innholdet ikke skal tas seriøst. De hevdet at ingen fornuftig person vil ta deres innslag som faktabasert:
"Fox News requested the case be dismissed. In support of its argument, the channel said that Carlson's show serves as "opinion commentary" that is "not reasonably understood as being factual." It also argued that McDougal's case "failed to allege actual malice." https://www.newsweek.com/tucker-carlson ... me-1534357
Så jeg tar å stoler på det Fox News selv hevder i retten.